Updated: Thursday, 06 Aug 2009, 7:59 PM PDT
Published : Thursday, 06 Aug 2009, 7:59 PM PDT
Posted by: Scott Coppersmith
Los Angeles (myFOXla.com) - The Japanese company that owns the rights to the movie monster
Godzilla sued a communications company and an advertising agency in
Los Angeles today, alleging the giant man-munching creature was
used illegally in a national television commercial.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court by attorneys for Toho
Co., alleges Comcast Corp. and San Francisco ad agency Goodby,
Silverstein & Partners violated federal copyright protections
by using the prehistoric marine iguana's image in a virtual
reality-style TV spot titled "Comcast Town" without prior approval.
The suit alleges that at no time did Comcast or Goodby,
Silverstein "seek or obtain Toho's permission or consent" to use or
feature Godzilla in the campaign.
The suit seeks payment for use of the radiated reptile's
image -- which could amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars or
more, Toho attorney Charles N. Shephard said.
Calls and e-mails for comment to the defendants after regular
business hours were not immediately returned.
Shephard said the TV spots were broadcast nationally earlier
this year.
In March, he said, Toho put Comcast on notice, requesting
that the company pull the ads.
"Even after that, they didn't remove it," Shephard said.
"They kept running it for several weeks, maybe longer."
Shephard said Toho has owned the Godzilla copyright since the
early 1950s and registered the name and image as trademarks in
1981.
The first of 28 films featuring the unstoppable beast was
released in 1956. All were produced by the Toho Co., which has also
authorized the Godzilla image for numerous comic books, animation,
posters, video games and books.
Shephard said the "Comcast Town" commercial, which advertised
such communications services as cable television, telephone and
high-speed Internet access, is no longer being broadcast.
"But they refuse to compensate us for the license fee," he
alleged. "They just took the image for free."
The complaint seeks a reasonable license fee for use of the
image, any profits that resulted and attorneys' fees.